In this paper, we provide a rational analysis of the effects of sycophantic AI, considering how a Bayesian agent would respond to confirmatory evidence. Our analysis shows that such an agent will not get any closer to the truth, but will increase in their certainty about an incorrect hypothesis. We test this model in an online experiment where users are made to interact with an AI agent as they complete a rule discovery task. Our results show that the default interactions of a popular chatbot resemble the effects of providing people with confirmatory evidence, increasing confidence but bringing them no closer to the truth. These results provide a theoretical and empirical demonstration of how conversations with generative AI chatbots can facilitate delusion-like epistemic states, producing beliefs markedly divergent from reality.
_ = tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)) = {}
，详情可参考必应排名_Bing SEO_先做后付
Open up the app and connect to a server in a location with access
郭晓东：那个年过得很伤感，前途无望，看不到未来，苦苦挣扎，但一直在原地打转。就觉得生活是一团糟，而且永远是在黑暗里。在黑暗里一直跋涉，但是一直看不到希望，一丝一点的光都看不到。现在回过头来想，可能是黎明前的黑暗。